Three interpretations / One editorial sensibility
Your portfolio already feels authored. These studies explore how typography, technical illustration, and the presentation of evidence can make that authorship even more persuasive.
The closest evolution. Dark paper, copper engraving, generous literary typography, and a more immediate record of what you’ve shipped.
Try the optional rotating contour plate. The still composition is the default.
The boldest impression. A broadside masthead, warm stock, two-colour overprinting, and a tightly edited working record.
Adjust the ink-registration slider. A printmaking idea becomes a small browser-native demonstration.
The strongest technical narrative. Sage paper, blue drafting ink, margin annotations, and experience written as evidence.
Explore the conceptual diagram’s layers and expand implementation notes without leaving the page.
Keep the original site’s dark editorial identity. Borrow the Journal’s hierarchy and the Fieldbook’s annotations: put scope, ownership, and a concrete result beside each significant role. Use one restrained interactive plate as a signature.
Running chapter labels; numbered plates that explain something; margin notes that surface engineering decisions; an intentional print layout; visible keyboard focus; motion that visitors can choose. These details make the editorial premise useful.
Standalone HTML concepts, with inline CSS, JavaScript, and vector artwork. Fraunces loads from a font CDN with local serif fallbacks. Career facts are drawn from the existing portfolio; no new results or employment claims are invented. The fieldbook diagram is explicitly conceptual. No production files were replaced.